GST Implication On Intellectual Property

Before the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, the Union government exclusively used to levy tax on transactions referring to Intellectual Property (IP) rights if such have been classified as services1 (below Service Tax, Chapter V, Finance Act, 1994), at the same time as the State governments used to levy tax on IP rights if the transaction regarding such were labeled as sale/deemed2 sale of goods3 (underneath State Sales Tax/State Value Added Tax or Central Sales Tax which become collected and retained by the originating State). The aforesaid indirect tax system required interpretation on the classification of the transaction. This frequently brought about double taxation whilst the same transaction turned into subject to each income tax and carrier tax due to the industry being cautious to avoid tax consequences.

GST Implication On Intellectual Property 13

Growing Stronger Together

With the appearance of GST, they want to classify transactions related to IP as both regarding the rendering of provider or sale/deemed sale of products was absolved. This is due to GST being concurrent4 in nature with the Centre and the States simultaneously and one at a time, levying it on a not unusual base or transaction irrespective of its class. It is pertinent to be aware that GST might apply to a supply of goods or services5 as against the previous concept of tax at the manufacture of goods or on a sale of goods, or the provision of offerings.

The GST to be levied for the intra-nation supply of goods and offerings via the Centre would be known as Central GST (CGST), and that to be levied by using the States [including Union territories with legislature] would be known as State GST (SGST). Integrated GST (IGST) is to be accumulated via the center on inter-kingdom supply of goods and services.6 IGST could also be applicable on imports.7 GST is a vacation spot primarily based on consumption tax; the tax is obtained through the nation wherein the goods or offerings are consumed and now not via the state in which such items are manufactured.

Rates in terms of Intellectual Property

Section 9 of the CGST, 2017 [corresponding section 9 of SGST] states that the CGST (or SGST because the case may be) will be levied on the transaction value8 or the fee surely paid or payable for the stated supply of products and/or offerings and at such charge to be notified on the tips of the GST Council. Subsequently, the prices have been notified as follows9:

Under Sl. No. 17, Heading 9973-

Temporary or permanent switch or permitting the use or leisure of Intellectual Property (IP) right in admire of goods aside from Information Technology software program on the charge of 12% (6% CGST and six% SGST). Temporary or permanent switch or permitting the use or entertainment of Intellectual Property (IP) right in recognize of Information Technology software program at the price of 18% (nine% CGST and 9% GST). “Information Technology software” means10 any illustration of commands, information, sound, or picture, which include source code and item code, recorded in a machine-readable shape, and able to be manipulated or supplying interactivity to a consumer, buy a laptop or automatic records processing gadget or every other device or device.

Transfer of the proper to apply any goods for any reason (whether or not or no longer for a certain duration) for coins, deferred fee, or different precious consideration on the equal rate of important tax as on delivery of like items concerning switch of identity in items.
Any switch of right in items or of undivided percentage in items without the switch of name thereof at the same price of vital tax as on delivery of like goods related to transfer of name in items.

Brief Analysis

It is pertinent to note that beneath the GST regime, permanent switch/sale of a selected intellectual property right could be considered as delivery to the carrier, and a 12% tax (6% GST and 6% SGST) would be levied on the transaction price provided such IPR isn’t in admire of software. Temporary transfer or permission to apply or revel in (license or undertaking) any IPR would also be taxable on the same charge provided it doesn’t always regard IT software programs.

Earlier, permanent switch changed into no longer considered a declared carrier and consequently not exigible underneath service tax. It is also to be cited that in advance, the exclusivity check (whether or not transfer/challenge/license is specific to the transferee) as laid down inside the BSNL judgment11 become the same old for determining whether the transfer could increase quantity to sell (and therefore, concern to income tax) or license (and hence, situation to carrier tax). Under the GST, it’s miles immaterial for the reason of taxation whether the said transfer is exceptional or for that count number brief due to the fact it’ll be subjected to the identical concurrent tax.

It is also pertinent to notice that the sale or licensing of highbrow belongings bearing on software could be charged 18% tax (nine% CGST and 9% GST). Even though GST has achieved away with the need to classify transactions in respect of products and services, the Centre has in a manner reversed the TCS judgment12 which had held that transactions regarding reducing wrapped software (software program sure with the product) turned into to be considered as a switch of the proper to use such software items (and consequently deemed sale of goods13) even as the same is to be dealt with as provider due to the notification.14

Related Articles : 

It will also be referred to that the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 [by which the GST was introduced in the constitutional framework] did now not amend Article 366(29A)(d), which specifies that the transfer of the proper to apply any goods is to be deemed as a sale of these items. However, with the aforesaid notification15, the Centre whilst notifying the taxation charge, has in a way, categorized the switch of the proper to use any goods to be handled by the provider.

Reverse Charge on Copyright

GST is to be levied at the individual presenting the products and/or services. However, Section 9(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 states that the Centre may also specify certain categories of supply of products and offerings. The tax is to be paid on a reverse charge foundation by using the recipient of the supply. Therefore, as consistent with notification16, the tax at the supply of offerings through an author, song composer, photographer, artist, and many others. Using a switch or allowing the use or enjoyment of copyright regarding unique literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic works to a writer, tune corporation, producer, and many others. Will be borne by using the stated writer, tune organization, or producer.

“Registered Brand Name” inside the context of GST.

It is to be noted that the supply of certain items, including China or paneer, herbal honey, wheat, rice and other cereals, pulses, flour of cereals and pulses, apart from those packed in the unit container and bearing a registered logo name, is exempted from CGST17. Supply of such items, while positioned up in the unit container and bearing a registered brand call, draws a 2.5% CGST rate18.

Subsequently, doubts have been being raised as to the meaning of “registered emblem name.” On July five, 2017, the Finance Ministry issued a press release19 clarifying the identical. The declaration mentioned that the “registered logo name” has been described in the notifications20, and the identical would suggest an emblem call or exchange name, which is registered under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. In this regard, the registered change mark method is a change mark that is simply at the register and remaining in force21.

Thus, until the emblem call or alternate call is clearly on the Register of Trade Marks and is in pressure below the Trade Marks Act, 1999, GST rate of 5% (2.5% CGST and 2.Five% SGST) will now not apply to the supply of such goods.22 It is pertinent to note that this will lead as much as a scenario in which a selected enterprise selling, say, cereals in unit containers bearing a brand name; however, such emblem call is not at the Trade Mark Register, and for this reason not in force, might be exempted from GST.

Such state of affairs could also enlarge to new players in the cereals (or different exempted goods) industry who have carried out trademarks and whose marks have no longer been registered. The relevant query posted with the aid of this rationalization is whether smaller gamers could now be discouraged from filing for trademark registration due to availing tax exemption, which could lessen their charges? This may cross towards the objective of the National IPR Policy 2016, which inspires the commercialization of

IP at the grass-roots degree. Still thinking about the importance of Intellectual Property, such producers want to apprehend the gravity of the problem that no registering of Trade Mark is not beneficial to them thinking about the marketplace for their merchandise that is ultimately diagnosed by their brand name. As a result, they can not come up with the money to not guard their logo call simplest to save a few minor percentages of GST. Thus, significance/benefits of Trade Mark Registration while in comparison to the applicable GST for products beneath Trade Mark which is not on sign up, it is indeed crystal clean that producers have to guard their IP, which in all situations need to be of paramount interest which helps gain earnings using leaps and boundaries.


With the advent of GST at a nascent stage, it’s far still to be seen how the implementation is carried forward. At the very least, the GST has added approximately a wonderful exchange by removing the want to categorize transactions as both referring to items or services when you consider that all transactions would now be concurrently levied tax by using both the Centre and the States (provided transaction is intra-nation deliver; inter-nation to be levied solely through Centre). The GST has additionally subsumed numerous critical, kingdom, and municipal taxes. Doing so will ensure that indirect tax charges and systems are common across the USA, thereby growing the actuality and simplicity of doing business.

Hardcore webaholic. Unapologetic pop culture enthusiast. Music evangelist. Avid alcohol lover. Social media trailblazer.
Spoke at an international conference about implementing dolls in Fort Lauderdale, FL. Spent 2002-2007 working with human growth hormone in Pensacola, FL. Spent college summers exporting foreign currency on Wall Street. Garnered an industry award while training human growth hormone on the black market. Spent 2002-2007 promoting fatback in Libya. Spent 2001-2007 implementing jack-in-the-boxes in Libya.

Forgot Password